Your Discussion Guide Might Be Killing Your Insights
- Sean Jecko
- 4 hours ago
- 2 min read

There's a tension at the heart of qualitative research that doesn't get talked about enough: discussion guides designed to maximize learning often do the opposite.
Here's how it usually plays out. Stakeholders want answers. The pressure to get every possible insight out of time spent with respondents is real. So the discussion guide gets packed. Every angle gets covered. What started as a guide morphs into a script to make sure nothing slips through the cracks.
Then you get into the room and one of two things happens:
The respondent gives a thoughtful answer to question three that goes long. Now you're ten minutes behind and scrambling to cut questions on the fly.
Or the respondent gives quick, surface answers and there's no time to probe deeper. You end up with findings that sound exactly like what everyone expected.
The guides that look most thorough often produce the least interesting insights.
What Design Gets Right
Graphic designers know that white space isn't wasted space. It's functional. It lets your eye rest and gives the important stuff room to land. Without it, even good design turns into noise.
Conversations work the same way. White space in a discussion guide isn't about being underprepared. It's strategic. Insight doesn't come from asking more questions. It comes from giving people room to think out loud, to contradict themselves, to stumble into something true that they didn't know they thought.
Some of the best insights I've seen came from guides that were basically an outline on half a page. Meanwhile, those 12-page guides with sub-bullets? They tend to produce reports that feel predictable.
Trust the Process
I get the impulse to build comprehensive guides. It feels like proof you've done the work, like insurance that the money will be well spent.
But here's the thing: a good moderator will get to the learning. Not by checking off every question, but by asking the right ones and creating space for the conversation to go where it needs to go.
More questions doesn't equal more learning. The best insights I've uncovered didn't come from question fifteen. They came from the pauses. From letting silence do some work. From the off-the-cuff comment someone made when they had room to think.
Maybe it's time we left a little more space for that.


Comments